When I decided to move back to Toronto from the 'country', townies poked fun at me about moving to the big smoke where there's nothing but concrete and graffiti.
They said that people in the city weren't friendly like 'small town' folk. Truth is, I spent five years living north of Hwy. 7, and while it was pleasant for the most part, I didn't make many friends.
Was that my fault? Probably. But unless you grow up in those small towns and everyone knows you from their Grade 5 class, or novice hockey team, or your father was a prominent farmer or councillor, it is hard to be accepted into inner circles.
So when I finally took the plunge and traded dirt roads for streetcar tracks, I noticed something fairly quickly: I didn't move to a big, faceless, smoggy jungle as described by the small-townies.
My part of the city even has a name: The Junction. It is a thriving community, with stores and restaurants owned by locals. It organizes its own events and fundraisers. The residents take pride in making their piece of the city a better place.
It's as if someone took a small town and planted it in the middle of a metropolis. The Junction just landed its own farmer's market, adding to its 'small town' charm.
And this is not unique to The Junction. There are many proud and independent communities across Toronto (The Annex, The Beach, Riverdale, Parkdale, etc.) that could likely exist on their own if you lifted them up and planted them in the wilderness.
Same could probably apply for other major cities made up of distinct — and named — communities. (See Vancouver or NYC, for example.)
The divide between Toronto's downtown and its suburbs (helped along by its current mayor) is just like the attitude the northerners had about the city, and vice versa. Many are only concerned with what will benefit or impact their own backyard and immediate neighbours, and that's no different north or south of Hwy. 7.
The divide within Toronto is also evident when someone in the east or west end gets invited downtown — "but that's so far!" they say. It might as well be a long drive to the middle of nowhere for many people. They don't want to leave their corner of the city; everything they need is where they are.
So while of course they have more people, cities don't have one cohesive group of people. It is just a large collection of smaller communities packed closely together.
I just wish the city had less traffic. And friendlier people. You know, like small towns.
Total Pageviews
Monday, April 16, 2012
Friday, January 27, 2012
If I had a time machine

No sir.
If I had a time machine, I would visit the dawn of man to hear the first ever joke. Perhaps it was just a loud fart that made the other cavemen laugh?
If I had a time machine, I would go back and see who first discovered that drinking rotten honey (or rotten grapes) was a good decision.
If I had a time machine, I would streak naked onto the ice during the 1993 Stanley Cup semis between the Leafs and the Kings just as Gretzky was about to score a deciding goal (sorry Gretz, I love you).
If I had a time machine, I would visit my 18-year-old self and kick his ass.
If I had a time machine, I would do what I could to keep most of the music bands in the 80's (and 90's and recently) from ever happening.
If I had a time machine, I would not have bought a Ford.
If I had a time machine, I would go far into the future to prove that teenagers will eventually lose their fingers and just have thumbs for texting.
If I had a time machine, I would also travel (hopefully not too far) into the future to warn my children that I'm a bit weird, and to not copy that trait.
If I had a time machine, I'd be rich. Because I could sell it on eBay.
Sunday, November 6, 2011
medicate
with the weight of day
hanging heavy in veins
on a tuesday noon
look but don't see
smell but don't touch
smile but don't laugh
they call it success
… what's that?
i lost it
the moment
has
passed …
the sunlight divides you
from those early thoughts
to the next grey cloud
just past your view
just open the bottle
the next sure thing
hinging on hope
didn't work for you
remember that time
laying bare in the grass?
a lifetime is asking
for you to return
Monday, September 5, 2011
Is social media making us less social?
For millions of years, humans and their descendants have adapted to their environment to thrive.
But now we're creating our own environment, and developing ways to communicate beyond natural means.
That of course includes the internet, and more specifically, social media.
Those born today know how to handle an iPhone by a year old. They expect to press a button and have wonderful things happen.
The young never knew a time when landlines, handwritten letters and direct talking were the only ways to communicate.
Now we can select who we talk to in a make-believe world of electronic impressions. We can reveal as much about ourselves as we want to, select who can contact us, and filter out any negative information.
Online dating has become an increasingly accepted form of finding a mate, replacing the old-fashioned 'pick-up'. Those who are succeeding in this new form of seeking a partner are not necessarily alpha males or females, but the ones who have figured out how to make the best of electronic communication.
Will nature adapt to our increasing need for information and decreasing attention span?
Of course, that's impossible for one to know for sure. But I'm envisioning children of the future with limited vocal capacity and thinner fingers (for easier texting).
OK, that might be a bit far-fetched.
But what is sure is that if you put four teenagers together at a table today, more often than not they will text their other friends or surf the net. Our ability (older generations included) to hold an actual conversation might be fading.
Once the baby boomers who never knew computers are gone, this trend may only grow stronger. In two or three generations, it will be even easier to share thoughts without effort.
Maybe now is a good time to start a conversation about the future of conversation.
Thoughts?
But now we're creating our own environment, and developing ways to communicate beyond natural means.
That of course includes the internet, and more specifically, social media.
Those born today know how to handle an iPhone by a year old. They expect to press a button and have wonderful things happen.
The young never knew a time when landlines, handwritten letters and direct talking were the only ways to communicate.
Now we can select who we talk to in a make-believe world of electronic impressions. We can reveal as much about ourselves as we want to, select who can contact us, and filter out any negative information.
Online dating has become an increasingly accepted form of finding a mate, replacing the old-fashioned 'pick-up'. Those who are succeeding in this new form of seeking a partner are not necessarily alpha males or females, but the ones who have figured out how to make the best of electronic communication.
Will nature adapt to our increasing need for information and decreasing attention span?
Of course, that's impossible for one to know for sure. But I'm envisioning children of the future with limited vocal capacity and thinner fingers (for easier texting).
OK, that might be a bit far-fetched.
But what is sure is that if you put four teenagers together at a table today, more often than not they will text their other friends or surf the net. Our ability (older generations included) to hold an actual conversation might be fading.
Once the baby boomers who never knew computers are gone, this trend may only grow stronger. In two or three generations, it will be even easier to share thoughts without effort.
Maybe now is a good time to start a conversation about the future of conversation.
Thoughts?
Saturday, August 20, 2011
The Wedding Files: Part II
I think I might have the solution to the world's economic problems.
(Wait for it… wait for it…)
OK, now.
Everyone should get married.
WHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAT?
Here's why.
First there's the suits (ka-ching). And the dresses (ka-CHING). The shoes, the ties.
OH, oops… and the rings. How did I not put rings first?
Engagement rings are one thing. (I personally can't complain, since I proposed with an heirloom ring. Probably why I didn't list it first. But then, I can't complain about the suit either.)
You'll of course need wedding bands. Marketing genius dating back to medieval times, I'm guessing.
And then there's the venue(s). The food. The photographer (so someone can take photos of the food and the people eating it.) the DJ. The booze. The parting gifts.
Don't forget the invitations, and the subsequent thank you cards. Lord knows Canada Post can use all this business.
Oh, you also have to buy a 'wedding license'. What does this prove? Nothing. It's a Provincial tax of $140. You go to city/town hall and fork over cash, and they give you a piece of paper that basically says 'thanks for telling us'.
Then the honeymoon (again I can't complain, thanks family). The struggling U.S. will get a tiny boost from our visit to their west coast (can't wait, California.) But 100 million tourist visits, now we're talking.
Imagine all the Americans honeymooning in Banff. Canadians honeymooning in California. Belgians honeymooning in Taipei. Taiwanese honeymooning in Switzerland. And so on. Money flowing all around. A win-win-win-win, etc.
My wedding is now less than a month away, and I count my blessings that my family and family-in-law is helping to ensure it all goes well. I'm very grateful, don't get me wrong. Please don't confuse my dryness with contempt.
I am a lucky man.
But seriously. Think of it. One big year of weddings… world-wide. Weddings of all sizes – your grand 'look-at-me' events with 500 guests, your small-time, small-budget nuptials in a poorly lit room with seven people.
So all you people on the fence, all you people who are holding out for whatever reason… just do it. It's only as painful as, say, ripping off a Band-Aid. Yes, I capitalized Band-Aid. It's a name brand.
And when you do get married – children. Most likely. Right?
I don't have to start to list all the costs there, right from the get-go to the age of say… 32.
Ka-ching, taxes. Birth certificates. Cell phones. Cars. University. WEDDINGS. ka-CHING.
OK, so back to my point. Everyone, get married. Commitment ain't so bad. Good for the economy, and maybe people will get along more in the world.
Even if we're all poor after it's all said and done.
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Time to Unplug
It's time to pull the plug.
(That is, after you read this blog post.)
When was the last time you unplugged? Oh, sure, you say you're relaxing. You say you have no worries. Yet there you are, checking your phones as if important news is coming any second.
The fact is, we've forgotten how to chill out.
Information coming at us from all sides: Internet, TV, ads, radio, everywhere. Every one of them trying its hardest to win our attention. (It seems for now, the Internet has won. Or you wouldn't be reading this, and I wouldn't have written this.)
I'm not pointing fingers. We're all guilty of trying to take in too much information. Our attention span has dwindled as our thirst for gratification has increased.
We're not giving our minds a chance to recharge. There's always something we have to do, somewhere we have to be, someone we need to contact. There's no space in between anymore.
Pause.
Take a deep breath. Take several.
Look away from the screen and/or mobile device.
Turn off the TV.
Close your eyes for a few minutes. Or hours.
Just be.
…. and be sure to read my next blog post. Coming this August. Sponsored by Creemore and Apple.
(That is, after you read this blog post.)

The fact is, we've forgotten how to chill out.
Information coming at us from all sides: Internet, TV, ads, radio, everywhere. Every one of them trying its hardest to win our attention. (It seems for now, the Internet has won. Or you wouldn't be reading this, and I wouldn't have written this.)
I'm not pointing fingers. We're all guilty of trying to take in too much information. Our attention span has dwindled as our thirst for gratification has increased.
We're not giving our minds a chance to recharge. There's always something we have to do, somewhere we have to be, someone we need to contact. There's no space in between anymore.
Pause.
Take a deep breath. Take several.
Look away from the screen and/or mobile device.
Turn off the TV.
Close your eyes for a few minutes. Or hours.
Just be.
…. and be sure to read my next blog post. Coming this August. Sponsored by Creemore and Apple.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Why I'm cheering for Vancouver
First off, let me just say that I'd love to be cheering for the Toronto Maple Leafs in the Stanley Cup finals this year.
But I can't.
OK, that's out of the way.
So, let me explain why I'm cheering for Vancouver, while so many others in Canada apparently aren't for whatever reasons.
First there's the simple logic: there are two teams left. One is based in the U.S. and the other is based in Canada. I am supporting the Canadian team. Call me crazy and patriotic.
Now let's rewind a year and a bit to the 2010 Winter Games. Remember how the country united while watching athletes from all over Canada kick butt. Remember how we all cheered for every save Roberto Luongo made toward our gold win in hockey (how soon we forget).
OK, so this was a national team in the Olympics, you say. True enough. But the players on Vancouver are also from all over the country, including some from the GTA: Raffi Torres is from Toronto and Manny Malhotra (who made an amazing comeback from an eye injury to play in the finals) is from Mississauga. There are others from the GTA on Vancouver's roster.
Also let me say that by cheering for Vancouver, it doesn't mean I'm not 'loyal' to Toronto. I have said it before and I will say it again, if Toronto gives me a reason to cheer for them (i.e. make the playoffs), I will jump back on that bandwagon so hard the wheels will fall off.
By cheering for Vancouver (as the Canadian team), it doesn't mean I don't like American teams. I loved Dallas in their prime (Mike Modano was awesome) and I was very happy for Chicago last year. I also really enjoyed the Ray Bourque years of Boston; I was thrilled when Bourque finally hoisted a cup after being traded to Colorado.
Oh, and let's not forget how torn I was when the Gretzky-led Kings defeated a very strong Leafs squad in 1993.
So anyways, I will probably take some flack for this, but I'm really not sure why. Liking a team doesn't mean I dislike you or your team of choice. I just like mine better.
Go Vancouver. Go CANADA.
But I can't.
OK, that's out of the way.
So, let me explain why I'm cheering for Vancouver, while so many others in Canada apparently aren't for whatever reasons.
First there's the simple logic: there are two teams left. One is based in the U.S. and the other is based in Canada. I am supporting the Canadian team. Call me crazy and patriotic.
Now let's rewind a year and a bit to the 2010 Winter Games. Remember how the country united while watching athletes from all over Canada kick butt. Remember how we all cheered for every save Roberto Luongo made toward our gold win in hockey (how soon we forget).
OK, so this was a national team in the Olympics, you say. True enough. But the players on Vancouver are also from all over the country, including some from the GTA: Raffi Torres is from Toronto and Manny Malhotra (who made an amazing comeback from an eye injury to play in the finals) is from Mississauga. There are others from the GTA on Vancouver's roster.
Also let me say that by cheering for Vancouver, it doesn't mean I'm not 'loyal' to Toronto. I have said it before and I will say it again, if Toronto gives me a reason to cheer for them (i.e. make the playoffs), I will jump back on that bandwagon so hard the wheels will fall off.
By cheering for Vancouver (as the Canadian team), it doesn't mean I don't like American teams. I loved Dallas in their prime (Mike Modano was awesome) and I was very happy for Chicago last year. I also really enjoyed the Ray Bourque years of Boston; I was thrilled when Bourque finally hoisted a cup after being traded to Colorado.
Oh, and let's not forget how torn I was when the Gretzky-led Kings defeated a very strong Leafs squad in 1993.
So anyways, I will probably take some flack for this, but I'm really not sure why. Liking a team doesn't mean I dislike you or your team of choice. I just like mine better.
Go Vancouver. Go CANADA.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)